Article Analysis Paper: Fatal Child Abuse

Article Analysis Paper The authors Kauppi Anne, Tuji Vanamo, Kari Karkola, Juhani Merikanto that wrote â€Å"Fatal child abuse: a study of 13 cases of continuous abuse† was published on 5 January 2012. The main point that this author is trying to convey is how child abuse is active all around the world. Even though some are fatal which is rare it is still on the rise to this day. Many of the children living in those conditions could have been prevented from someone reporting the abuse but failed to do so.Many of the parents in the study knew about the battering, but because the violence of the family members hindered the other parent to put an end to the abuse. The injuries in the children were also seen in daycare or by other authorities but failed to act in time. The signs of battering was a change in the child’s behavior such as depression, withdrawal, anxiety or being absent from school or daycare. The most common injuries in abuse is skin and soft tissue.In the fat al abuses, it was most always head trauma. After fatal battering most parents do not want to take the unconscious child to the emergency room because they did not intentionally mean to kill or seriously hurt the child. In the beginning of the paper, it tells some background on the injured patients and then the results on what happened to the children and parents. Also, there is a chart that lists the age, patient, and short descriptions containing the abuse done to them.The end of the paper has a discussion about how child abuse is under reported or not looked into enough. Meanwhile, tells how important reporting it could be or how it could save an innocent child’s life. The evidence that the author has is statistics and a chart of how many children are being effected by child abuse. Also, percentages of how many children had soft tissue injuries or head trauma which is fatal. The author is trying to address this to everyone.This needs to be addressed because people often see that a child is getting abused but does not want to get involved so they do not report it. Millions of children are abused each day and no one does anything about it. Seeing that this article was only written a year ago shows everyone it is still going on today and we have not found a solution but needs to be addressed to prevent abuse as much as possible. People have been trying to prevent this for years and now child services are cracking down on these cases more often.I like this article a lot and agree with it one hundred percent. Its strength is it talks about things that are happening every day that needs to be prevented and taken care of. It also shows the risks, signs, and symptoms that happen to innocent children. I would recommend this article to someone else because this could be helpful for anyone to know the signs of child abuse or the things that could happen if it was not reported. I think this article could be useful for my research because it has a lot of statistic s I could use.

Delete Questions on SAT Writing 6 Steps to Answer

Add/Delete Questions on SAT Writing 6 Steps to Answer SAT / ACT Prep Online Guides and Tips Add/Delete questions require you to determine whether a sentence should be added or deleted from a passage. There are multiple add/delete questions on SAT Writing, so figuring out how to tackle these questions is imperative to improving your Writing score. In this post, I'll do the following: Explain add/delete questions Teach you the basic constructions of add/delete questions Provide example questions Give you strategies and a step-by-step approach for answering these questions Add/Delete on SAT Writing Add/Delete questions ask you if a sentence should be added or deleted from a specific part of a passage. Typically, these questions involve two parts: you have to determine if the sentence should be added or deleted, and you’ll also have to select why the sentence should be added or deleted. These questions require reading comprehension and understanding how a sentence fits within a passage. Generally, there are about 2-4 add/delete questions on the SAT Writing section. General Construction of Add/Delete Questions Being able to identify an add/delete question will help you determine how to quickly and efficiently select the right answer. Here are the general constructions for the add/delete questions you’ll find on SAT Writing. Add Questions This is the general construction of an add question: At this point, the writer is considering adding the following sentence. [Question Sentence Here] Should the writer make this addition here? A. Yes, because†¦ B. Yes, because†¦ C. No, because†¦ D. No, because†¦ You have to determine if the sentence should be added and identify the reason why it should or shouldn’t be added. Delete Questions Here is how delete questions are constructed: The writer is considering deleting the underlined sentence. Should the writer do this? A. Yes, because†¦ B. Yes, because†¦ C. No, because†¦ D. No, because†¦ Or you might see a delete question posed like this: The writer is considering deleting the underlined sentence. Should the sentence be kept or deleted? A. Kept, because B. Kept, because C. Deleted, because D. Deleted, because For delete questions, you have to determine if the underlined sentence makes sense at that point in the passage. Both questions are asking the same thing, but the wording of the questions is slightly different. Also, pay attention to the answer choices. In the first type, you choose answer choice A or B if the sentence should be deleted. In the second type, you choose choice C or D if the sentence should be deleted. Always read the question and answers carefully. Now we know how add/delete questions are constructed. Step-by-Step Guide to Add/Delete Questions Here are the steps to follow to answer add and delete questions. Add Questions These are the first two paragraphs of a passage and an add question from a practice SAT. #1: Analyze the Added Sentence to See What It’s Doing The sentence is pretty straightforward. It’s stating that some scholars believe that the lavishness of the lifestyles during the reign of King Louis XV helped bring about the conditions that caused the French Revolution. #2: Refer Back to the Passage to See if the Sentence Should Be Added Given Where It Would Be Placed The added sentence must be relevant in context. It must logically follow previous sentences and set up the information that comes after it. While the previous sentence references King Louis XV, the passage up to that point is about an exhibit showing tiny rooms. The following sentences are a description of the miniature salon. The sentence in question wouldn’t make sense because the focus of the paragraph is on the appearance of the room and has nothing to do with whether or not the excesses of the era caused the French Revolution. #3: Answer the Yes or No Question First Because the sentence wouldn’t logically fit in the context of the passage, we can determine that the answer is no. #4: Eliminate the Two â€Å"Yes† or â€Å"No† Answer Choices Because the answer is no, we can immediately eliminate A and B. #5: Provide the Reasoning in Your Own Words In my own words, I would say that the sentence shouldn’t be added because the paragraph is focusing on the appearance of the room. #6: Pick the Answer Choice That Most Closely Matches Your Reasoning Answer choice D is wrong because there is no mention of the interior designer. Again, the focus is on what the room looks like. The correct answer is C. It most closely matches our reasoning. Adding the irrelevant sentence would disrupt the description of the miniature salon. Delete Questions Next, I'll walk you through how to answer a delete question. The steps are very similar to those of the add questions. #1: Determine the Purpose of the Deleted Sentence The sentence is providing the cost of starting a new coworking business in the US. #2: Refer Back to the Passage to Determine if the Sentence Should Be Deleted Based on Its Location in the Passage In our example, we have to determine if providing the cost of starting a coworking business is relevant to the focus of the passage. The passage is describing coworking spaces. Nowhere else is there information about starting a coworking business. If you’re not reading closely, you may see the word â€Å"fee† in the first sentence, and then assume that that’s related to the underlined sentence. However, the first sentence just mentions that you can use coworking spaces for a fee; it has nothing to do with starting a coworking business. Again, the focus is on the traits and qualities of coworking spaces. #3: Answer the Kept or Deleted Question First Because the sentence is irrelevant to the focus of the paragraph, the sentence should be deleted. #4: Eliminate the Two Kept or Deleted Answer Choices Because the sentence should be deleted, we can eliminate choices A and B. #5: Provide the Reasoning in Your Own Words I would say that the sentence should be deleted because the cost of starting a coworking business isn’t related to the paragraph’s focus of describing coworking spaces. #6: Select the Answer Choice That Most Closely Matches Your Reasoning While I didn’t provide the previous paragraph, there’s no mention of the cost of starting a coworking business in that paragraph. We can eliminate answer choice D. The correct answer is C. The sentence isn’t related to the paragraph’s main focus. Sean MacEntee/Flickr Quick Review: General Strategies Here’s advice to follow when answering all add/delete questions. #1: Determine the Purpose or Summarize the Sentence That Would Be Added or Deleted In order to decide whether to add or delete a sentence, you need to know what the sentence means and why it would be included in the passage. #2: Refer Back to the Passage to Determine If the Added or Deleted Sentence Logically Fits Any added sentence should logically follow the previous sentence and connect to the following sentence. Additionally, an added sentence must be relevant to the focus of the paragraph or passage. A sentence should be deleted if it falls outside the scope of the passage or doesn’t logically connect to the previous and following sentences. #3: Answer the First Part First Answer the â€Å"yes† or â€Å"no† question or â€Å"kept† or â€Å"deleted† question first. #4: Eliminate Wrong Answer Choices You can immediately eliminate the two answer choices that don’t match your answer to the first part of the question. If it's an add question and you think the sentence should be added, you can get rid of the answer choices that state the sentence shouldn't be added. Or if you think the sentence shouldn't be added, you can get rid of the two answer choices that claim the sentence should be added. #5: Select the Answer Choice That Most Clearly Matches Your Reasoning For all add/delete questions, before selecting an answer, determine in your own words why a sentence should be added or deleted. Ideally, you’ll see an answer choice that’s almost identical to your reasoning. If there’s no answer that matches your reasoning, work backwards to select the correct answer. Start with the answer choice and then determine if it's accurate. Or, if time permits, review the question/passage again to make sure you didn't make a mistake. What's Next? As you're preparing to become an SAT Writing superstar, make sure you thoroughly understand the most important grammar rules on SAT Writing. Also, if you're not yet familiar with the most recent changes to the SAT, find out about what's different and how to prepare for the new SAT Writing. Finally, learn how diligence and the proper methods can help you get a perfect SAT score. Want to improve your SAT score by 160 points? Check out our best-in-class online SAT prep program. We guarantee your money back if you don't improve your SAT score by 160 points or more. Our program is entirely online, and it customizes what you study to your strengths and weaknesses. If you liked this Writing and grammar lesson, you'll love our program.Along with more detailed lessons, you'll get thousands ofpractice problems organized by individual skills so you learn most effectively. We'll also give you a step-by-step program to follow so you'll never be confused about what to study next. Check out our 5-day free trial:

Political Science - Global Warming Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Political Science - Global Warming - Essay Example The most prevalent of these gases is carbon dioxide. There has always been a natural layer of greenhouse gases in the Earth’s atmosphere, but the present augmentation is widely held to be the result of human activities, primarily the burning of fossil fuels and environmental alterations, especially deforestation. The burning of fossil fuels – coal, oil and natural gas – is mainly done in industrial processes, in energy production, and also in transport. Because fossil fuel consumption is much greater in industrialized and more economically developed countries, North America, Europe and Asia are responsible for over 90% of global fossil fuel output. Deforestation, meanwhile, is most serious in South America, and especially in the Amazon basis. Furthermore, if current trends continue, fossil fuel consumption will continue to increase, especially as countries with large populations, such as India and China with a combined population of over 2 billion, rapidly indust rialize. All of this is causing the temperature of the Earth to increase at a much faster rate than is usual, and perhaps at a rate faster than it has been for thousands of years. The increasing blanket of greenhouse gases traps heat from solar radiation in the Earth’s atmosphere, and as the temperature within becomes higher, water stored as ice in glaciers or the ice caps is melting, causing sea levels to rise.

Epicenter and Magnitude of the Earthquake Assignment

Epicenter and Magnitude of the Earthquake - Assignment Example To locate the epicenter of the earthquake, the seismologists examine seismograms from three seismic stations. The seismologists measure the time interval of S-waves and P-waves in about 45 seconds and place the vertical lines at an interval of about 2 seconds. The measured S-P time interval will help to determine waves distance of travel from the focus to the station. It is paramount to note that the actual location of the epicenter is on the circle's perimeter to be drawn around the station. Therefore, to triangulate this position, there must be three seismic stations. A circle with an appropriate radius is drawn around every station and where the three circles intersect is the epicenter of the earthquake. Â  The seismologists use a well-known Richter scale to measure the magnitude of an earthquake. To determine the earthquake’s Richter magnitude, seismologists require one to know the surface the wave’s amplitude and the distance to the origin of the earthquake at the seismic recording site or location. The distance of the seismic recording and footage station from the epicenter can be determined by getting the time difference between the arrival of the P-waves and S-waves at the station. The difference is called S-P interval. The amplitude of the surface wave depends on the earthquakes magnitude and the distance between the epicenter and recording station. It is a measure of how many millimeters the ground will move at the recording station. The amplitude and S-P interval is then used to determine the Richter magnitude.

Risk Management Plan in hospital (2) Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 6750 words

Risk Management Plan in hospital (2) - Essay Example Administrative control Cost containment Part of the business plan for the hospital Hospital Risk Management: Operative Activities Risk identification Preparation for emergencies and disaster Proper discharge and appropriate patient transfer Attainment of informed patient consent Optimal medical staff monitoring and peer review Claims investigation and claims management Specific disease policies Administrative Control Administration Operation Environmental concerns Patient care Medical ancillary departments Legal and ethical issues Financing for these activities Scope Cost containment Counteracting spiraling risk associated costs Specific risks and their solutions Improvement in stakeholder satisfaction Integration with quality assessment Specific Risks Liability risks Malpractice suits Local legislation and regulations Financing and insuring risks Risk prevention Transfer techniques Patients' rights Accidental falls Property damage Reduction in cash flow Employee benefit risks Lowering community image Objectives A confident decision making and planning to ensure patient safety Analysis of patient safety issues and policies yields accurate identification of opportunities and threats Appraisal of uncertainty and variability of scenarios and extracting meaning out of them Proactive management and planning targeted at prevention Uniform and legitimate allocation of resources in synchronization with quality policies of the hospital Efficient management of adverse incidents leading to cost cutting and loss prevention Enhanced stakeholder trust, reputation of hospital, and confidence building in potential future customers Conformity to legislative and legal frameworks Smooth and effective corporate and clinical...From that perspective, while dealing with the issues related to patient safety, it must be considered that most medical and nursing professionals are aware about the issues related to patient safety. Studies of other high-risk industries and human factor engineering have led to advancement of knowledge about how mistakes and errors can lead to compromise in patient safety while cared for in a hospital. Indeed, the issues with patient safety are very closely linked with quality of care delivered, and medical profession is ethically bound by the principles of no harm. Current knowledge indicates that many people admitted to the hospital may suffer an injury resulting from error or negligence on the part of caregiver, for which not only the hospital, but also healthcare professional is responsible leading to liabilities. These are known as adverse events, and a risk management plan drawn on the current scenario of the care in the hospital wo uld be legitimate. In this assignment drawing on the AS/ANZ 4360:2004 as developed in HB436:2004, a risk management plan for patient safety in this writer's hospital will be developed with appropriate arguments for all steps of the plan. Connection of the context with the hospital's internal policies of safety risk solutions, quality control, goals, and objec

Future Career Goal and Current Skills Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

Future Career Goal and Current Skills - Essay Example Therefore, I studied a bachelor’s degree in business, to understand the general concept of business and then I joined Leeds Business School to do my master in Strategic Management. Firstly, I am an initiative person with high level of confidence and I have taken some big decisions in my life such as getting married early, in the second year of my undergraduate study. Moreover, I quit a good job with a high salary to build upon my knowledge, which, in my opinion, will lead me to get a better job. Secondly, because I love planning, which I believe is one of my strength, I choose Strategic management program in masters. Thirdly, I have very good communication skills, partially in mother language. For long-term goal, to be an effective leader, I need to have technical skills, which is the knowledge about a certain work, human skills which is an ability to work with people, and conceptual skills which are the key skills of creating a vision and having a strategic plan on organisation (Northouse, 2013). Moreover, as a potential leader, practicing leadership roles is really needed for structuring my personal leadership skills. Furthermore, Understanding the different cultures is crucial for me because my home country has multi-national citizens. Moreover, I need to learn the right way of delivering a message and vision effectively, under different circumstances (Appendix A) For the short-term goal of being a successful lecturer, I have to develop myself personally and academically to provide good learning instructions to the students. This will require a lot of effort and incremental change towards building the desired knowledge (Biggs and Tang, 2011). In addition to this, it is essential for me to be critical when I explain the theories to my students. This will open their mind and improve they're anal the lysis and evaluations skills. (Appendix A)

The Impacts Of The Great Exhibition History Essay

The Impacts Of The Great Exhibition History Essay The Great Exhibition of 1851 in The Crystal Palace at Hyde Park was arguably the pinnacle of showing off Victorian Britain (in all its might, power, status, splendour and beauty) all in the luxury and elegance as befitted the worlds greatest empire and power at the height of the British Empire. It was a marvellous opportunity and event to showcase (in nationalistic patriotistic pride) great science and technological advances of Britain to (and for the first time) to both international and domestic countries. The exhibition was meant to showcase and highlight and illuminate how young, exciting and inspirational Victorian Britain was and how it was full of great ideas and innovations- some of which were worldwide firsts and to be treasured and valued highly. The honour and glory of Victorian Britain was on full public display and every class was somehow affected and involved. This essay will examine, describe and critically evaluate and explain the legacy of the Great Exhibition of 185 1 which specific and special attention to science and technological impacts. The elite landed and titled upper and middle classes tended overwhelmingly to dominate and form the majority in high society events and exhibits such as the great science and technology on display at the Great Exhibition of 1851 and was no exception to this rule. Specifically this essay will discuss the collection that was made and redisplayed when the original exhibition closed; other exhibitions that followed in other cities; the development of the various museums around South Kensington in London; also the development of various educational institutions and museums around South Kensington (including the Science Museum, and the Victoria and Albert Museum), partly because of the money made (the exhibition was a great success) and the fact that they had to do something with the exhibits which exhibitors didnt want to take back, and also the string of international exhibitions following the 1851 one (e.g., i n Paris etc) where e.g., electricity etc were displayed excitingly. The legacy of the Great Exhibition has been too narrowly researched and studied and to get a sense of the legacy of the Great Exhibition we have to cast the net wide  [1]  . Even though the Exhibition was popular and successful apathy and disinterest did increase at such a highly organised culture  [2]  Prince Alberts dreams, wishes, hopes and desires and aims were not fully met. Specifically and especially and particularly on the legacy for science museums to science grew in number and spread and  [3]  The legacy of the Crystal Palace suggests once again that Victorian science was not really a value-free search for natural truths- instead it was an enterprise that engaged God and capitalism, entertainment and commerce, the moral and the useful, science and show The effects on technology were instrumental too; The Great Exhibition broke down barriers and obstacles of secrecy and privacy that had for ages stopped the growth of the transitional spread of technical informati on across businesses and organisations. They were also a value-free place for new technologies to be showcased, tested live and promoted and judged and brought and publicised.  [4]  Punch tried so hard to degrade and poke fun and discredit and devalue the Great Exhibition of 1851 due to its racism, oppression and domination and the rampant big gap between the richer and poorer but Nevertheless, it cannot forget that popular opinion finds the Exhibition exciting and amazing and Punch, in the end, cannot escape the popular nationalist rhetoric of dominant Great Exhibition commentaries  [5]  . The Exhibition also had darker meanings it was already at work in half-hidden ways rewriting and transforming that culture  [6]  and internal displacement and dispossession  [7]  and .Hidden darker meanings and purposes behind the bright, light, facades (as a distraction and rouse).  [8]  Overall, the great ideals of Prince Albert were ultimately finally successful in time and space Prince Alberts dream of an international centre celebrating the arts and sciences has been achieved, through the determination and dedication of those who served the Commission over the intervening century and a half, either as members or officers. They have created the world-class museums of art and science which he wanted to see, founded in the wake of the successful international exhibition, and colleges in both cultures now train students from all over the world. Albertopolis celebrates its founders ideals and ambitions for his adopted country, but also exemplifies the truly international quality of the man himself and the institutions he created.  [9]  Prince Alberts dreams, wishes, hopes and desires and ambitions may have been lofty and some thought unattainable were in time gradually became realistic and attainable and achievable as the Prince was not naive and too ambitious he was actually as well also pragmatic methodical and sensible who kept in touch with real world practical applications as well as making grand bold claims. Changing perceptions and realities were instrumental to the legacy of the Great Exhibition of 1851. The socio-economic climate changed so much in the Victorian Period that fashions came and went. Eventually, around the turn of the century, the Crystal Palace euphoria began to wane. This was partly to do with changing notions of recreation, which no longer revolved around education, and partly the result of a wider education in support for Victorian values like free trade and cosmopolitanism which the Exhibition had propounded, and which had given the building symbolic value  [10]  The science and technology legacy of the Great Exhibition was a great forerunner and forethought and started the increasing modernisation and industrialisation of modern contemporary Britain  [11]  The main significance of the Great Exhibition was that it helped to harness the forces of industrialisation and, by making them acceptable, promote them in Britain and the world. There were many different groups involved in the event, and the aims of the Exhibition were various and often contradictory. In total, however, they represented a push for modernisation that helped overcome obstacles which still existed mid-century. This process continues down to the present. This type of rhetoric created for the first time in support of the Exhibition is still used to support technological progress, industrialisation, and globalisation today. The Great Exhibition was a dramatic contribution to the creation of the modern industrialised society in which we live.  [12]   Linked and mixed within the legacy of the Great Exhibition is not just science and technology but also inevitably and inexorably linked is the religious perception and reality. Most of the strong religious opposition to the exhibition dated from the late 1850 and the early months of 1851 but had largely disappeared by the time of the grand opening. Even some of the periodicals that had earlier criticized the exhibition changed their opinion after the official opening and participated in the widespread euphoria and optimism that the exhibition engendered.  [13]  Most religious factions gave in and joined in the celebrations of the 1851 Great Exhibition. this crucial disparity allowed many religious contemporaries to hail the Exhibition as a religious event, while others, including most historians, view it as a thoroughly secular celebration of technology, industry, and commerce  [14]  Odd mixture of a religious or entirely politically non religious event. that energetically so ught to evangelize among the visitors- demonstrated that they came to view the Exhibition as a crucially important event and one that required a decisive religious response.  [15]  Religion needed to be strongly represented and heard at the great exhibition of 1851. Thus while the organizers portrayed the Exhibition as a vehicle to disseminate peace and international brotherhood, many evangelicals perceived it as a prime opportunity to trumpet the pre-eminence of Protestantism and of England.  [16]  Indeed, for many of these writers the Exhibition served as an imperfect but humanly graspable model of the New Jerusalem. Most Christians, far from rejecting the Great Exhibition, welcomed it Could be seen as a great example of best practice for the whole world.  [17]  Thus while Catholics saw the Exhibition .oppression, the Anglo-Jewish elite perceived the successes of Jews in the Exhibition as legitimating the equality of the Jews at the height of the arguments over emancip ation. Secularists appeared to have been divided over the value of the Exhibition, with Owen in particular using it to propagate his messiac vision, while more radical Socialists saw only its social dangersBut for all three groups the Exhibition raised the issue of identity, as they struggled to position themselves in the religious landscapes of the mid-century.  [18]  Catholics saw it as exclusionary and exclusive; Jews saw it as a great opportunity to gain respect and admiration. Secularists had mixed views. Owen used it as a platform for his own views, opinions and ideals while other more radical people saw it only as subversive and dangerousmost of all it was a search for a concrete purpose for existence at all for religious groups. Like a number of other pacifists, Burritt considered that the Exhibition marked the start of a new era in world history, when the aura of peace and international cooperation would displace the old world of warring nations. While human willpower h ad an important role to play in ushering this new age, Burritts vision was deeply religious. The gathering of the nations in London was part of a divinely ordained plan and the fulfillment of prophecy. A new age was just beginning  [19]  Burritt and other such pacifists believed a new world order would come based on the lofty ideals of cooperation, respect, and peace and love rather than vicious factions ready for war forming and creating intense rivalries in naval and army power. Prince Albert not only stressed the importance of advancing industry and commerce through the exhibition, but also set this notion of material progress firmly within a religious frame. He envisaged the Exhibition as a divinely ordained event that would display Gods creation, advance Christianity, and engender both moral improvement and international peace  [20]  Prince Albert in greatly advocating and backing and supporting and patronising the Great Exhibition of 1851 believed it would be instrumen tal to the scientific and technological advancements moving forwards but within a secular way. This study has shown that many different aspects of religion entered the frame and that the Great Exhibition of 1851 cannot simply be portrayed as a secular event but also heralded an important moment in the religious world of early Victorian England. As one contemporary (John Stoughton) stated The Crystal Palace was a Monument of Christianity, From this perspective the significance of the Great Exhibition of 1851 lay in its profound yet multiple religious meanings.  [21]  So, The Great Exhibition of 1851, therefore, in conclusion, was a very important event not just for science and technology but for religion also too and that the varied and mixed responses highlight and illuminate this. The Great Exhibition of 1851 was the step to further equality and breaking down of barriers to the lower socio-economic groups who beforehand could only dream and wish of being close to the upper echelons of society were now in direct contact with them at the Great Exhibition of 1851,  [22]  The Crystal Palace was an apt if unconscious symbol of this new state of affairs: the walls were all of glass but the lower orders were now inside, joining in the funà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦. Bradford had such high quality  [23]  materials that it got prizes and awards. The mass movement of population streaming into London was followed in communities all across the country. It soon became apparent that 1851 would see by far the biggest influx of visitors that the capital had ever been required to endure. And many of its citizens were beginning to view the prospect with trepidation, even outright alarm  [24]  The upper classes and aristocracy feared in a very real and apparent way social revolu tion by the more lively and energetic revolting and dissenting lower classes and feared their dominance and strength and power may diminish and so it was very important to impose order and control.  [25]  There were late objections and difficulties by the exhibitors.  [26]  At least worries about the security and steadiness of the building were reducing  [27]  The Exhibitions were a colourful, varied mixture of real finds of great beauty or complexity or good practical applications but some were just for show in there by luck and chance and good fortune  [28]  . The British science and technology on display was the best most cutting edge of the period but also frivolous tat and educating others about how our natural resourcesà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦fuel our role as a leading manufacturing nation..  [29]  There was the first real attempt to introduce foreign more exotic food and drink in the Great Exhibition of 1851 with regional dishes from all around the world. Although economically a failure Soyers Symposium was the first tentative step towards the cosmopolitainisation and worldwide influence on the English taste buds  [30]  The Great Exhibition of 1851 did not start the process of international cooperation and harmony as lots had feverishly wished for But it did herald changes in British society far more profound than its promoters could ever have imaginedà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦Ã‚  [31]  The Great Exhibition of 1851 somehow rallied together and strengthened and renewed and revived and refreshed a trust and faith and belief in the goodness of the monarchist system. There was a real reluctance and resistance to leaving for a few.  [32]  The legacy continued for the next three decades at least, as The Crystal Palace held regularly scheduled events and activities such as world record attempts, animal shows and all different kinds of exhibits and fairs such as floral shows and such like so on. Its last grand large scale event was the 1911 Festival o f Empire.  [33]  In 1851 the wonder and excitement at such a new and exciting Exhibition was very real and matchless. There were a succession and series of Great Exhibitions and Worlds Fairs from 1851 to 1939 never matching in a real way the grandeur and splendour or popularity or success of the initial landmark 1851 Great Exhibition. Exhibitions grew in strength and power and number in a way that was both gradual and hesitant but also was going to happen whether or not regardless of circumstance or situation  [34]  Exhibitions were both very expensive to run, but also had amazing potential as a centre for business and earning economic potential. They were intended to distract, indoctrinate, and unify a population  [35]  The Imperial displays at exhibitions filled a role which had been relentlessly demeaned undermined or sentimentalised since the fall of the orthodoxy conservative. European society and culture was very mixed up and muddled and conflicting and differing and confused in its intentions and purposes à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦The coming together of contradictory values at the exhibitions, w hereby positive notions of progress were buttressed against organised oppression and exploitation, says much about the plural morality in operation throughout European culture at the time. Ultimately, as with a vast number of cultural artefacts, it must be concluded that the exhibitions embodied neither good nor evil in any simple sense but were a complex mixture of bothà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦Ã‚  [36]  The Exhibitors rather than breaking down inequality and hatred maybe even strengthened and increased the endemic racism and exploitation and oppression à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦one of the few levels where European Society operated in the absence of class was in the domain of racial prejudice. Messages phrased in consistent manner to all levels of society affirmed the inferiority of coloured peoplesà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦ with little good coming out of them in social, moral, or intellectual terms.  [37]  Before World War Two nations were able to put aside differences to exhibit together. Rather than culti vating understandings and cooperations as time went by nations refused and objected to exhibit with rival ideologies especially and particularly after WW2.  [38]  Ãƒ ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦No international understanding, no growth of human fellowship, no reconciliation of peoples or nationsà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦Ã‚  [39]  Art and fashion and architecture and design have gone downhill in quality and inventiveness and originality after WW2.  [40]  There was no massive greater equality for women in the twentieth century with regards to women exhibiting and being exhibited à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦In fact this has not been the case, much of the twentieth century being little better than the nineteenth in terms of the presence of women artists in expositions, galleries and museumsà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦Ã‚  [41]  It was wrong to overstate or over exaggerate The Fine Arts role in exhibitions and worlds fairs à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦Having said this, without the fine arts, as elite and rarified as they were prone to be, the exhibitions would have lacked one of the conceptual elements which keep them perennially interestingà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦.  [42]   The outward image the exhibition gave was very important and was negotiated and compromised and debated over at length and breadth. What should be clear though from the outset is that the exhibition lacked any crude or fixed ideology. Rather, its organisation reflects many different objectivesà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦Ã‚  [43]  Rather than universally maintained with the British people, they turned to the idea with scepticism and distrust and criticism. Britons did not immediately support the idea, as outcries over the contract and the building should have been made clear. Resolving these disputes was only a stop gap measure for the organisers, at best, an exercise in damage control (had to act as mediators and peacekeepers)à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦Critical to the success of the exhibition would be the commissions ability to sell the plan to the public in a positive way, to promote and publicise the exhibition to the entire nationà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦Ã‚  [44]  The Great Exhibition was not just an isolated metaphorical event but it had purpose and meaning too and it had to be marketed, branded and promoted for it to be a success but it was not just an ideological tool for increasing nationalism and patriotism as its meanings it projected were mixed and unstable.  [45]  The Great Exhibition recemented and reminded of Britains high and special and grand status of a leading scientific and technological nation à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦It meant hand-crafted as much as machine-made goods. It mean small-scale as much as large-scale production. And it meant finding a balance of both arts and manufacturers, of commerce and cultureà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦Ã‚  [46]  The Great Exhibition showed that even though Britain was deeply split in socio-economic and cultural and political terms it was still united There was in a sense, both integration and segregation..  [47]  There was an altogether more darker and sinister and revealing and illuminating other alternative purpose to the Exhibition that instead of all being about peace and love and harmony and reversing barriers that pre existed to greater integration and cooperation the population at large also saw it as a great competition to promote British greatness and its own meanings for existence by making fun of exotic other countries though humiliation, demonization and oppression and exploitation. Its greatest most lasting legacy was that it was greatly highly valued and treasured and famous internationally and domestically. From its construction in 1854 until its destruction in 1936, the Crystal Palace in Sydenham, far more than the memory of the Great Exhibition in Hyde Park remained an enduring symbol of the nation. It was the icon that foreigners such as Dostoyevsky and Taine and nationals such as Disraeli and Gissing pointed to as the barometer of Britains successes and failures, its character and orientation  [48]  There was no single unified meaning or purpose to the exhibition as the purposes and meanings were flexible and changed through time and space. For some it symbolised progression (and a nation at the height of strength, influence and power); for others it stood for all that was incorrect with Victorian Society (such as the extravagance and inequality and opulent luxuriousness and racism and oppression and exploitation). For some it was the eighth wonder of the world, an Arabian nights palace; for others it was ugly, full of old things. All of these debates, both at the time of the exhibition and since, have really been about the nature, or identity, of Britain. That the exhibition put Britain on display there is little doubt. What is, and always will be, open to question is just which visions and versions of Britain it exhibited.  [49]   The Great Exhibition carefully and methodically projected Britain to the wider world somewhat illogically. What Britain was was open to debate, negotiation and discussion. It was a chance and opportunity to reflect in a fair and accurate way to the world what Britain was like to live and work in and how it was seen to the world was of prime importance. Peoples perception at large of Britain (at the time of the Great Exhibition of 1851) needed to match the realities of living and working in Britain in the Victorian Period. Overall, it was a massive opportunity to market, promote, brand, and sell Britain as a destination to the world (internationally) like never before rather than just to the British residents (domestically and locally). The Great Exhibition therefore needed to be grand, theatrical, over the top, large, and popular and entertaining as well as teaching and learning and informing and educating the wider population. It had a difficult and challenging balancing act to jugg le and master. Greeces inclusion and partaking involvement in The Great Exhibition of 1851 was a extraordinary, amazing, surprising, unusual and odd due to its old fashioned conditions and very little growth expansion and progress rate and circumstances and situations of the Victorian Era and how backwards Greece was.  [50]  Americas involvement won over the hearts and minds of the doubters and deniers of America as a nation and it demanded attention and respect and admiration.  [51]  The Great Exhibition of 1851 was unsurprisingly not the first Great Exhibition and in the 1810s to 1840s the lower socio-economic groups of society in the Institutes of the professions and working class labourers in the metropolitan and provincial areas formed their own fairs and exhibitions  [52]  . In conclusion, the 1851 Great Exhibition can be seen as a great watershed moment. The Victorian love affair and obsession with the public display and pageantry in galleries, museums and exhibitions (both public and private) had always been present but 1851 kick started and accelerated and increased an explosion of new activities and events in the display of science and technology and it was seen as a great success. The Great Exhibition of 1851 touched society in cultural, political, religious and social ways but it would take many more further future generations to see full equality (on gender, racial and class lines) be fully achieved. The Great Exhibition of 1851 especially and particularly was just one tentative hesitant event on the long road to changing society (in the rich tapestry of broader life). To fully erase and eradicate the dominance and subservience in Victorian society and culture (which was so widespread and commonplace) would take radical and far reaching new though ts and feelings and new laws, rules, governance and statutes. The greatest legacy of this one exhibition (upon reflection) is the continuing formalisation and institutionalisation of science and technology and the widening of public education in science and technology and the growing fascination and appreciation and respect and admiration of science and technology more generally. Although the Great Exhibition was a platform on which countries from around the world could display their achievements, Great Britain sought to prove its own dominance and preeminence.